No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

Reply

Submitted 3 years 5 months ago

Hello there

Prior to 2013, there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available. Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out before 2013. Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account of when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Kind regards
Julie, LABC

No completion certificate but "Status: Building Work Complete"

Submitted 3 years 5 months ago

I'm trying to buy a house which has had a kitchen extension done.
The current owners do not have a completion certificate.
The council website shows a building control application for it with a status of "Building work complete"
Does this mean its fully legit and above board? Or does it need regularisation?
I haven't contacted the council because this may invalidate any indemnity insurance.

Reply

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

Hello there

Thanks for leaving your comment.

LABC is a membership organisation, providing advice and support to its member local authorities around England and Wales. As a result, LABC cannot comment on the details of the status of building regulations for individual cases, as this is a matter for the local council in the area in which the house is located and the council being the administering and enforcing authority for building regulations in that area.

While we understand that contacting the local council regarding the status of a building regulations application might invalidate any insurance cover you may wish to purchase, we would still recommend that you contact them to discuss the matter in the first instance. The council might be better able to explain what the information on their website means in relation to the status “Building work complete”, since only they can properly advise you on what information they have regarding that entry and if it relates to the extension or not, and if a regularisation application might be required.

As part of the conveyancing process, most solicitors will seek to obtain certain legal documents, and a building regulations completion certificate and/or approval are two such documents that they would normally try to secure as part of their due diligence process.

If the council were/are satisfied that the work – for building regulations purposes – is complete, then they should have issued a completion certificate; unless the work was carried out before the 9 of January 2013 and was undertaken by way of giving the council a Building Notice. However, even if the council were not obliged to issue a completion certificate automatically it might still be possible to obtain one, but there might be a charge made by the council for this service.

We hope this is of some assistance.

Regards
Wayne, LABC

Building regulations

Submitted 3 years 5 months ago

I converted a house in to flats in 2007 and sold the flats in 2017 on long leases. Just received a letter from from building control of lack of building control certificate.Can the building control take any action as the flat conversion was done in 2007.They have advised to apply for regulisation certificate which could be difficult as to expose some works would not be easy as I would not be able get access to flats I have already sold on long leases

Reply

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

Hello there

Thanks for leaving your comment.

LABC is a membership organisation, providing advice and support to its member local authorities around England and Wales. As a result, LABC cannot comment on the application and enforcement of the building regulations on individual cases, as this is a matter for your local council – being the enforcing authority for building regulations.

However, we would repeat the advice that we give in this article.

“If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.”

We recommend that you contact your local authority and discuss the matter with them in the first instance, so that they might explain why they sent the letter to you.

We hope this is of some assistance.

Kind regards
Wayne, LABC

no building regs on extension + loft conversion

Submitted 3 years 5 months ago

We were planning on buying a house and have found out that a two storey extension and loft conversion that was done 15 yrs ago but hasn't got building regs. The extension had planning permission but wasn't signed off. The extension has been inspected by building regs and is noted as completed but can't have a completion certificate as too much time has elapsed from it being done. The loft was not inspected and has no building regs. They are selling it as a 4 bed house although this room hasn't been signed off. Our main concern is about resale and how much of an issue these problems pose. Many thanks

Reply

Submitted 3 years 2 months ago

Hello - thanks for leaving your comment.

We can't comment on individual cases so you're best speaking to your local authority building control team about this matter. However we would repeat the advice given above:

"If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.
Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.
Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.
The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.
What about the next time the property is sold?
The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues."

Kind regards
Trevor, LABC

Garage Conversion

Submitted 3 years 4 months ago

We are in the process of buying a house and the current occupant converted half the garage into a sitting room, this was done 20 months ago. It is insulated, boarded and plastered and an RSJ was put in where a window was put in. However they didn't go through the Local Authority for building regulations. This was picked up on by my solicitors who are advising that the seller gets retrospective certificate. The seller's solicitor is advising them not to do this and that they should purchase indemnity insurance, and that they advise all their clients to do this if required and that it is the best way forward.

The sellers are reluctant to contact the Local Authority in case they get in trouble and are worried that they could be made to return garage to original condition or that an inspection will cause lots of damage at their expense, and are pushing for us to go down the indemnity route along with a Structural Survey at their expense. I am tempted to go down this route, but worried that I will end up having problems when I come to sell the property in the future and am at my wits end with what to do.

No Buildings Completion Cert, can we extend?

Submitted 3 years 4 months ago

Hello! We've found a house that we're in the process of buying, but just found out that a copy of the building completion certificate doesn't seem to exist for the 2x storey extension done back in the 90s. The vendors had emailed the LA to request a copy but was told that they can't access the records at the moment due to Covid, and even if they could, it's unlikely the records still exist as the works were completed 25 years ago. The vendors seem to think they got the certificate but misplaced it, but we're starting to think that they never got one, but obviously can't be sure. Considering the vendors have contacted the LA to request a copy and they're responded saying the above, then surely this is considered as "notifying the LA" and therefore would invalidate an indemnity if we were to opt for one? We're not sure what to do in this situation really. Our main concern is that we want to buy the house with the plan to extend it - this is our first property and we've never extended before so unsure of all the ins and outs, however surely we're assuming that we will encounter issues when we come to submit our plans and obtaining permission to exited and surely there is no current indication that the current building which was extended in the 90s is deemed safe? How can we get permission to extend off something that isn't LA-approved? Hope that makes sense! Does anyone know if you're allowed/will get planning permission & approvals to extend off a building that didn't have the final completion certificate? Or does this not come in to play when you submit planning applications for new extensions? Also our worry is that we'll encounter the same issue with future buyers when we come to sell the property one day. Any help, tips, input would be hugely appreciated!! Many thanks!!! :)

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin