No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

LABC response

Submitted 1 year 4 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your recent on-line enquiry.

LABC is a membership organisation, providing advice and support to its member local authorities around England and Wales. As a result, LABC cannot comment on the application and enforcement of the Building Regulations on individual cases, as this is a matter for the local council – being the enforcing authority for building regulations.

An extension built in 1991 would have required Building Regulations approval. I have inferred that a Building Regulations application was deposited at the time as you stated that the extension was “….built to building regulations”. However, in 1991 the Building Regulations would have only placed an obligation on the Council to issue the owner with a Completion Certificate if they had asked for one at the time of making your building regulations application and if the owner had also given the Council notice about completion within 5-days of all the work having been completed. The legal responsibility for Councils to issue a Completion Certificate, whether one had been asked for beforehand, or 5-days’ notice of completion had been given or not, did not become law until January 2013.

If, however, no Building Regulation application was deposited at the time, the works may be considered “unauthorised”. In this situation, retrospective approval (known as a ‘Regularisation’) can be requested from the relevant Local Authority Building Control. For your information, the kitchen extension would be required to comply with the requirements that were applicable at the time the works were carried out rather than the current requirements of the Building Regulations.

We are also aware that Councils are only obliged to retain records, about building work, for up to 15-years after the work has been completed. As such, given that you state that the work was completed in 1991, the Council may have destroyed all records relating to the project by now. As a result, we recommend that you discuss this matter with your Local Authority Building Control team to establish if there is anything they might be able to assist you with.

With regards to the proposed relocation of the kitchen, this will most likely require a Building Regulation application (for more information on this see www.shorturl.at/aKW29). The general rule for building work carried out at your home is that the actual work you carry out should comply with the Building Regulations (i.e., the kitchen and services to it). When you complete the works, your home should not be less satisfactory for Building Regulation purposes than it was before the works were started. We would recommend that you discuss your proposals with a competent designer or contractor, and you can also contact the Building Control team at your Local Authority to discuss any project specific requirements. You can find the contact details of the relevant Building Control team by entering your postcode in the search box at the top right-hand side of our website.

Kind regards,
LABC

Missing building regulation for garage conversion

Submitted 1 year 5 months ago

Hi,

I am in the process of buying house. Local searches highlighted that garage was converted into living space in 2010. Planning permission is approved but building regulation and completion certificate is missing.

I checked the local authority website and saw that building regulation application were made but they are still showing in pending state.

My solicitor has suggested since the structure is 10+ years old so there is no need of it. I am not convinced with their answer. My solicitor asked to call LA and check if the building regulation document is available. LA denied giving me any information saying that information can only be shared with the owner.

I contacted to estate agent ans explain him the situation. The estate agent mentioned that since now I have told LA about the missing certificates so seller can not give me the indemnity insurance as it's null and void.

What can I do now ?

Thanks.

LABC response

Submitted 1 year 5 months ago

Hi,

We are unable to provide legal advice regarding the purchase of a house so I would suggest you speak to your solicitor to discuss the best way to proceed.

Best,
LABC team

Missing building regulation for garage conversion

Submitted 1 year 5 months ago

Can I go ahead and apply for building regularization certificate from council now ? I have spoken to builders they mentioned that if I need to do a remedy work as per council suggestion then it would cost between £8,000 to £10,000.

LABC response

Submitted 1 year 4 months ago

Thank you for your recent on-line enquiry.

LABC is a membership organisation, providing advice and support to its member local authorities around England and Wales. As a result, LABC cannot comment on the application and enforcement of the Building Regulations on individual cases, as this is a matter for the local council – being the enforcing authority for building regulations.

If the garage conversion was initially undertaken without Building Regulations approval, the works may be considered “unauthorised”. In this situation, retrospective approval (known as a ‘Regularisation’) can be sought from the relevant Local Authority Building Control department – however, as detailed in Regulation 18 of the Building Regulations it must be the current owner that applies for this. For your information, the garage conversion would be required to comply with the requirements that were applicable at the time the works were carried out rather than the current requirements of the Building Regulations; however, you can of course go above and beyond the minimum standards of Building Regulations if you wish.

We are unable to comment on the costings for undertaking any works – if you are in any doubt on the costings you may wish to consult a competent independent surveyor and/or seek further quotations from alternative builders.

Kind regards,
LABC

Loft conversion

Submitted 1 year 5 months ago

The previous owners had a loft conversion with no buildings regs, but has gas and electric regs, it has been done to a high standard, in my builders opinion, but left it as loft space with ladder , I only had to put a staircase and door in and have made it into a bedroom can i get retrospective buildings certificate for it.

LABC response

Submitted 1 year 5 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your comment. The type of work you describe as having been carried out before and after you moved in is, in our opinion, building work which is controlled under the building regulations. Consequently, we recommend that you should contact your local council building control/regulations team and discuss with them if they will accept an application for a Regularisation Certificate.

Best,
LABC team

Can Adjoining property work affect me?

Submitted 1 year 4 months ago

I’m in a 1930’s traditional semi and My neighbour has started work to remove the chimney breast from the front room and front bedroom on the left wall. Leaving the structure above the upstairs room in place. Having checked with LA portal there has been no application made for regs, nor was the party wall act notice formally given to us. Just a word he was having work done.
I’ve taken it up with him and he’s assured me the builder is reputable and has done all the right calcs. I’ve given him reference websites and written everything down and asked him to speak to his builder. I’ll give him a few days and if he won’t submit for a regularisation I will formally report to LA.
If after all that he won’t comply - where do I stand in respect to my own property should I decide to sell in the future ?
I’ve already spoken informally to LA who tell me I need to report unapproved work starting but I’m trying the softly softly approach to try to maintain relations.

LABC response

Submitted 1 year 2 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your comment.

LABC is a membership organisation, providing advice and support to its member local authorities around England and Wales. As a result, LABC cannot comment on the application and enforcement of the Building Regulations on individual cases, as this is a matter for the local council – being the enforcing authority for building regulations.

The partial removal of a chimney breast on the ground and first floor as you described is controllable works under the Building Regulations, therefore is subject to an application - for more information see www.labc.co.uk/news/how-to-get-it-right-removing-chimney-right-way-video-showing-wrong-way. Unauthorised works should be reported to the relevant Local Authority, who may be able to take enforcement action where needed. If you are concerned about the impact on your property from unauthorised works in a neighbouring property, you may wish to instruct a competent Building Surveyor and/or lawyer to assist you in determining your exact position - particularly in the absence of a Party Wall agreement for said works.

Kind regards,
LABC Team

No sign off

Submitted 1 year 2 months ago

We started a project pre covid using private building control but before sign off their insurance was pulled meaning we are now subject to labc. Its been a good few years and we haven't had any contact from labc, all works completed a couple of years back. what should we do? don't want labc opening everything up to see all is to standard - i've got loads of photos etc.
Not sure if we let sleeping dogs lie on this.....

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin