No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

demolition of derelict cottage beside my cottage without approva

Submitted 3 years 6 months ago

There were 2 derelict cottages beside my cottage. In 2014 , a neighbour knocked the furthest derelict cottage down without building approval and did not seal the roof of the remaining cottage which adjoined my cottage. Now I have tiles blowing off the roof. Whereas, up until the demolition the toilet on the roof were in tact.

Regularisation

Submitted 3 years 6 months ago

We want to put an offer in on a property that comprises of 8 flats in one freehold building. To be able to raise money on it in the future we need to create 8 separate leasehold properties. This is achievable with a good specialist solicitor and land registry standard plans.....expensive but well worth the effort.....however!
We also need a building regs completion certificate for the solicitor to be able to create the leasehold properties. The original conversion to flats was completed over 25 years ago and there is nothing other than boiler installations registered with building control as nothing else has been done according to the sellers.
How should we proceed? If we ask labc to attend what will it be able to provide for us? Are the properties considered by today's regulations or regulations in place at the time of the actual conversion?
We are awaiting historic planning information to establish the actual year of the conversion. Is October 1985 relevant to this?
I can't work out what I might be able to obtain that I could give to the solicitor to enable them to create a leasehold property in the absence of a completion certificate.....especially if it proves to be pre 1985. Could you give me any suggestions or should we not touch it with a barge pole?! The conversion appears to have been done brilliantly with no expense spared and meets all current fire safety, gas safety, electrical safety and EPC requirements.
Many thanks

Completion certificate and Warranty certificate from LABC

Submitted 3 years 6 months ago

Hi
We are purchasing a house with a completion certificate and warranty certificate from LABC. The extensions was competed over 15yrs ago. However, building regs search have found that the application was refused. Could this be an error as there is a completion certificate for the same application number?

Reply

Submitted 3 years 5 months ago

Hello there

Thanks for getting in touch with LABC. I would advise you that it is possible for works to continue following the issuing of a rejection notice, the key thing here is that a completion certificate has been issued for the works. The certificate provides evidence, but not conclusive evidence, that the works comply with the relevant requirements of the building regulations. I trust you find this response useful.

Kind regards
Richard, LABC

Extension

Submitted 3 years 6 months ago

Hi,

I'm in the process of purchasing a property and the searches have revealed the extension was done back in 1990. Unfortunately there does not appear to be a building regs sign off cert for it and my solicitor is in the process of asking for an indemnity to be provided. My main question is that the extension is a master bedroom and utility which I want to convert to ensuite in the bedroom and turn the utility into a wet room for disabled user. When this is done and checked etc will it show up that the extension wasn't signed off originally or will the checks just be of that current work?

Many thanks in advance.

Reply

Submitted 3 years 5 months ago

Hello there - thanks for getting in touch with LABC.

In the first instance, I would seek clarification from your solicitor on the benefits of obtaining indemnity insurance for the works, since it is not clear what purpose this would serve for works undertaken over 20 year ago. It would be worth determining why a completion certificate has not been issued for the extension. It may be that there are only minor outstanding items to resolve which you could arrange to be dealt with. With regards the proposed alteration works, building control would need to satisfy themselves that the new works comply with all relevant requirements and may require certain elements of the existing work to be exposed in order to do this. You are advised to liaise with your local authority building control team, prior to submitting your application. I trust you find this response useful.

Kind regards
Richard, LABC

Part removal of internal stud wall

Submitted 3 years 6 months ago

Hi, I had the wall between my living room and dining room removed to make it more open planned, I had 3 builders come in and quote for the work, all 3 said that the wall was not load bearing, the joists on the ground floor run parallel to the wall and not perpendicular, upstairs it proved difficult to get a visual because we had carpet and under that was ply board covering the joists, but they took a look in the loft and the joists there run both parallel and perpendicular. Also the main beams holding the roof come down on the main wall that runs north/south, the wall we took out ran East/West. We decided to go ahead as the builders said it would be exempt from building regs as it was not load bearing, the work was completed in August 2019, they have not put in an RSJ lintel but have doubled up on the beams, they advised me that if they were concerned about it being a load bearing wall they wouldn't have undertaken the work (this was a friend), we have had no signs of cracking, bowing or anything else, our house is a terraced victorian. My issue is we are now selling and I am wondering if this will be brought up in the survey. I didn't have a certificate from my friend as the work was done in good faith, I am now thinking how nieve can I be!!

Reply

Submitted 3 years 5 months ago

Hello there

Unless you also took out the bedroom wall above, then this sounds like a load bearing wall and would have needed building regulation approval. You can still obtain this by depositing a Regularisation application with your local authority building control team. You may have to expose some of the work to establish that the wall above has been adequately supported. A completion certificate would then be issued if all is correct and this would be evidence that you have followed the correct procedure.

Kind regards
David, LABC

Floorplan inspection

Submitted 3 years 6 months ago

We knocked the wall between the toilet and bathroom in our ex-local authority flat (almost 3 years ago) but never asked com consent from council, which we now understand we should have. now we received a letter from them asking to come and inspect our floorplan to make sure it complies with building regulations. What is the best to do? Try to get the retrospective consent before they come? Or let them in, and explain we do not have and deal with consequences?
What can happen here?

Reply

Submitted 3 years 5 months ago

Hello there

We would advise you to get in touch with your local building control team to talk this through. You can find their direct contact details in the postcode search at the top of this page.

Kind regards
Julie, LABC

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin