No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

LABC response

Submitted 1 year 2 months ago

Hi,

Thankyou for your comment. An application should have been made to the LA as a reversion application. The only way to resolve the application, and to ensure that you as the home or building owner are protected in terms of the building regulations and the important consumer protection that is provided as a result to both you and any future owners, is to contact the LA and arrange for an inspection. The photographs can be provided for the LA to review as part of the application.

Best,
LABC team

Steal Bean Installed

Submitted 10 months 1 week ago

What happens if a 152x89x16kg UB - floor support beam is put up without building regulations? Would I need to get this Passed off by them?

LABC Response

Submitted 9 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your enquiry.

This work is likely to be considered unauthorised work. You may wish to apply to your local council for a regularisation certificate. You can find the contact details of the relevant Building Control team by entering your postcode in the search box at the top right-hand side of our website.

Best,
LABC Team

Annex extension

Submitted 9 months 3 weeks ago

Hi, there
We were wondering in 1989 we had an annex built for my mother and it was approved by building regs then. I've realised that we haven’t had the building signed off. Will this be a problem and cost involved? Thank you

LABC Response

Submitted 9 months 2 weeks ago

Thank you for your enquiry,

You will need to contact the LABC team where your Mothers house is and they will be able to confirm the status of the application and any next actions in terms of sign off for building regulations

Best,
LABC Team

1982

Submitted 9 months 2 weeks ago

I just bought a flat which was converted in 1982. Had planning but I can’t find building refs sign off and if I don’t find it, the council identify it with a section 257 HMO. It was before the 1985 cut off for retrospective sign off. What can we do?

In reply to by Alex Rappini (not verified)

LABC Response

Submitted 9 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your enquiry.

As the work appears to have been carried out prior the November 1985 deadline then you should contact your solicitor to see what checks were made at the point of sale.

Best,
LABC Team

(No subject)

Submitted 9 months 1 week ago

Thank you for the great post! I'm always happy when people write things that are both informative and entertaining. Keep up with your amazing work by posting on my blog too, please :) http://www.mini-piling-london.co.uk/

(No subject)

Submitted 9 months 1 week ago

I love reading your posts! You're so creative and interesting, it's a real breath of fresh air. I would be happy if you left some comments on my blog too :) https://piling-contractors.london/

(No subject)

Submitted 9 months 1 week ago

I thoroughly enjoyed reading your blog post. The content was well researched, and your writing style is engaging. I would love to have you contribute to my blog as well, so please keep up the fantastic work. https://khbpiling.co.uk/

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin