No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

wooden framed lean to - Hair Salon

Submitted 9 months ago

strange one this, my wife and her ex-partner had a wooden lean to style structure built on the side of the house so she could work from home as a hairdresser.
it was built about 14 years ago and I have since bought her ex-partner out of the house and we have recently applied for planning permission to build an extension.
the hair salon is fully lined, insulated and has electrics and basic plumbing (a power shower and a sink).
the local authority has asked for a Regularisation Application to be submitted but I can't find any details on what exactly we need to submit.
any advice gratefully recieved.

LABC Response

Submitted 8 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your enquiry.

The following response is my opinion on behalf of LABC, it is not a definitive interpretation of the legislation and remains a matter for the relevant enforcing authority to determine.

Regularisation applications are dealt with under Regulation 18 of the Building Regulations 2010. However, it is very difficult to provide a definitive list of what information is required, save to say that broadly speaking sufficient information will need to be provided to the Local Authority to allow them to determine that the works comply with the relevant parts of the Building Regulations. You may need to seek the advice of a competent designer to help you collect and collate this information.

For your information, Regulation 18 states that unauthorised works are assessed against “…..the building regulations which were applicable to that work when it was carried out”. Therefore, the Building Control team at the relevant Local Authority will be applying the regulations that were in force at the time the works were undertaken.

Kind regards,
LABC

2010 roof renwal

Submitted 8 months 1 week ago

Hi,
I have had an offer accepted on a house that had a new roof installed sometime 2009 and 2013 (TBC).
The Council searches my solicitor has ordered have not recorded any buildings regulations approvals.
Would the exact date of the work carried out have any implications on whether there should be the correct building regulation certificates/paperwork available?

LABC Response

Submitted 8 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your enquiry.

In terms of the applicable regulations that were in force at the time that the work was carried out. The LA can only ask for the re-roof to be built to the standards of the day. E.g. the amount of insulation required will not be to todays standards but those in 2009-2013 being the dates you have outlined. If there was no application made, then you or the current owner can make an application to your local LABC team by way of a regularisation application. Please contact your LA where the work is based, we have a post code search facility on our website to assist you, labc.co.uk.

Best,
LABC

utility room sold as a bedroom

Submitted 8 months ago

Hello, I am currently in the process of purchasing a Victorian house in London. The top-floor bedroom is listed in the lease from 1985 as a utility room. The sellers have informed us that some work, likely a loft conversion, took place many years ago, although we are unsure about the exact date. Unfortunately, there is no documentation available, and the sellers are offering us indemnity insurance. I'm curious about how this might impact the value of the house. Can the room, which has a Velux window but relatively low ceilings, actually be considered a bedroom? what should I do?

LABC Response

Submitted 5 months 3 weeks ago

Thank you for your enquiry.

The following response is my opinion on behalf of LABC, it is not a definitive interpretation of the legislation and remains a matter for the relevant enforcing authority to determine.

It is very difficult to give detailed advice without further information, particularly due to the date the works were likely undertaken.

The majority of the provisions within the Building Act 1984 came into force on 1 December 1984, with the associated Building Regulations becoming operational on 11 November 1985.

So, if the ‘loft conversion’ was undertaken after 11 November 1985, and no Building Regulations application was deposited at the time, the works may be considered “unauthorised”. In this situation, retrospective approval (known as a ‘regularisation’) can be requested from the relevant Local Authority Building Control. For your information, the “loft conversion” would be required to comply with the requirements that were applicable at the time the works were carried out rather than the current requirements of the Building Regulations.

However, prior to January 2013, even if a Building Regulations application was deposited with a Local Authority for the loft conversion, the Building Regulations would have only placed an obligation on the Council to issue the owner with a Completion Certificate if they had asked for one at the time of making the Building Regulations application and if the owner had also given the Council notice about completion within 5-days of all the work having been completed. The legal responsibility for Council’s to issue a Completion Certificate, whether one had been asked for beforehand, or 5-days’ notice of completion had been given or not, did not become law until January 2013.

We are also aware that Councils are only obliged to retain records, about building work, for a minimum of 15-years after the work has been completed. As such, given that you state that the work was completed in mid-1980’s, the Council may have destroyed any records relating to the project by now even if an application was indeed deposited at the time.

If Building Regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6) of the Building Act 1984, the Council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that does not comply. Also, the Council has powers under Section 77 and 78 of the Building Act 1984 if the loft conversion was ever to be deemed dangerous.

An insurance indemnity policy may assist with completing the conveyancing for the purchase of the property, but it does not remove the potential problem with the property. In summary, LABC would recommend you seek the views of a competent Building Surveyor and legal professional to advise on the best way forward.

Kind regards,
LABC

Wetroom not passed by building regs

Submitted 7 months 2 weeks ago

Hi
My son bought a house 18 months ago. Recently had problems with wet room and contacted council who have no record of the previous owner advising them so not passed other than as an extension and normal room. Who should have checked this as we just thought as it had pass stamp all was OK?

LABC Response

Submitted 7 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your enquiry.

In terms of the work carried out previously the building regulations require that the person carrying out the work ( i.e. the owner or contractor) notifies the LA, by way of application, for the wet room and then notifies when work to that wet room starts and completes.
You should contact the LA team where the work is based and make an application by way of a regularisation application so that work can be included and inspected to look to resolve the building work carried out previously.

Best,
LABC Team

2007 Loft conversion

Submitted 7 months ago

Hi

I’m in the process of purchasing a property that had a loft conversion carried out in 2007. There is a building control application come back on the searches for this conversion, and looking at the details on the LA portal it has a status of “Building Work Complete”, with a decision of “B.C. not accepted (Building Notice)”. The current vendors purchased the property in 2016 and have no certificate for the works.

What does the decision mean? The application has a completed date in 2011, so does this mean it has been accepted and should have had certificate issued via a Building Notice route?

Conveyancer has put indemnity in place but this has a clause that invalidates if a previous application has been made, which does worry me.

We’ve had a Level 2 rics survey carried out which advises that it should be clarified that the work has passed building regs, especially as there is no heating provision. The extension is of two bedrooms and a shower room.

Any advice you can provide would be appreciated.

Kind Regards

LABC Response

Submitted 5 months 2 weeks ago

Thank you for your recent on-line enquiry.

The following response is my opinion on behalf of LABC, it is not a definitive interpretation of the legislation and remains a matter for the relevant enforcing authority to determine.

LABC is unable to comment on individual applications – so we would advise that the Building Control department at the relevant Local Authority is contacted to seek clarification on the exact position of the application.

However, please note that prior to January 2013, the Building Regulations would have only placed an obligation on the Council to issue the owner with a Completion Certificate if they had asked for one at the time of making the Building Regulations application and if the owner had also given the Council notice about completion within 5-days of all the work having been completed. The legal responsibility for Council’s to issue a Completion Certificate, whether one had been asked for beforehand, or 5-days’ notice of completion had been given or not, did not become law until January 2013. However, in reality, many Building Control departments did routinely issue Completion Certificates prior to January 2013.

An insurance indemnity policy may assist with completing the conveyancing for the purchase of the property, but it does not remove any potential non-compliance(s) with the loft conversion.

In summary, LABC would recommend you continue to work with your appointed Building Surveyor and legal professional to advise on the best way forward.

Kind regards,
LABC

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin