No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

Reply

Submitted 3 years 9 months ago

Thanks for getting in touch with LABC.

I think it would be beneficial to speak with your local authority building control team and determine why a completion certificate was never issued. It may be that only minor items were left to complete and for whatever reason these were never chased up. Unless there are severe life safety risks, because of time constraints (not financial), you are right the local authority is unlikely to take enforcement action and again I agree indemnity insurance would serve no useful purpose.

You could submit a further application to extend further the existing extension, however if there are elements of extension construction that have not been inspected, or are not considered adequate and are to remain, these will need attending to. If you proceed with the extension, just make sure you chase the builder to get all works complete and this will enable the local authority to issue you with a completion certificate. As far as planning requirements in conservation areas – you are advised to liaise with your local authority planning department.

I trust you find this response useful.

Kind regards
Richard, LABC

Internal wall completion certificate

Submitted 3 years 9 months ago

Hi there,
We are due to exchange on a property in a weeks time (property is 17 years old). Our solicitor has just informed us that the sellers solicitor does not hold a completion certifcate for an internal wall between living/dining room that was opened up by the owners prior to the current sellers.
Have checked the LA building register & there is record of the work & completed certificate back in 2011.
Sellers solicitor is asking that we take out a Title indemnity policy, but we are reluctant to do so as down the line, we too might have issues should we come to sell the property.
Would it be 'opening a can of worms' for the current sellers to contact the LA for a copy of the certificate?
Thanks

Roof Terrace put in two owners ago

Submitted 3 years 9 months ago

Hi, thanks for the article and all the considered replies. I'm buying a house where the owner before the vendor put a roof terrace on. They definitely didn't get this signed off and it's now over the four year period the LA would tear it down over. Is it the vendor's responsibility to get this regularised, or mine? Does it need to be? Would a structural survey deem this safe or not?

Cheers
Rob

Completion certificate

Submitted 3 years 9 months ago

We are purchasing a property that does not have completion certificate for the work carried out in past 5 years which includes, converting a garage to a utility room, turning a room into a bathroom and taking down of walls to make it into open plan by installing RSJ. Could you confirm one retrospective certificate would be enough to regularise everything or a separate certificate would be required for each of the changes ? In general, what does a retrospective regularisation cover?

Thanks in advance.

Reply

Submitted 3 years 7 months ago

One regularisation application would usually be sufficient, covering all works undertaken without the building regulation necessary consent.

Your application should include plans prior to the works being carried out, as they stand now and what works are required in order to ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements at the time the works were undertaken. You should speak with your local authority building control section in order to determine their specific requirements in this instance. A building control surveyor would visit your property in order to inspect the works and discuss any remedial works required in order for a regularisation certificate to be issued. It is likely certain elements of the construction will require exposing, in order to determine compliance, and this may then lead to further works having to be carried out. The extent of exposing elements of construction will be determined by the building control surveyor, based on site inspections. It would be prudent to consider your options at this stage.

You may decide to leave this matter with the current owner and continue with the purchase of the property once a regularisation certificate has been issued, or alternatively purchase the property, taking account of the likely risks and associated costs.

Kind regards
Richard, LABC

Bent

Submitted 3 years 9 months ago

I have a question about a wooden construction to put a kitchen in. All the drainage and electrics are already in place. There is already a concrete base. Would it be possible to make this building larger and put the kitchen in.

In reply to by James (not verified)

Reply

Submitted 3 years 8 months ago

Hello there - thanks for leaving your comment.

Sounds like you may have a structure previously used as a porch or conservatory both of which were exempt from building regulations as they aren't considered to be part of the habitable space when they are less than 30m2 and thermally separated from the main house by an external quality door.

As such you would not be able to convert this into a kitchen without extensive improvements to the existing structure.

You'll therefore need to discuss this with your local building control team to decide if it may be better to build a conventional extension that will comply with thermal, structural, weatherproofing, fire safety etc requirements.

Kind regards
David, LABC

Garage conversion, chasing builder

Submitted 3 years 8 months ago

We had our garage converted into a playroom at the end of last year. The builder said he would sort the building regs etc, we paid him extra money for this. However since then we have been chasing him up to get this sorted and he keeps fobbing us off. We received a letter from the council saying that they could not complete the application as they had not received all the information or payment. We have since been back in touch with the builder who has now paid and said he has provided them with pictures (we had one visit from the LA once the work had been completed.) My partner has spoken to the council and they have provided a list of requirements they need confirmation for. We have some photos of these which we managed to get from the builder such as concrete lintel, floor insulation etc but not sure if we have evidence for everything they require and now the work is complete we can’t take pictures. What should our next step be? What will happen if we can’t provide evidence for these requirements etc DPC, roof insulation? If they can’t provide us with a certificate will this affect future sales.

Reply

Submitted 3 years 8 months ago

Hello there - thanks for leaving your comment.

Sorry but you really need to discuss this with your building control team at your local authority. They should have been called out at several stages during the construction to inspect certain aspects of the work and sadly it appears that your builder has failed to do this on your behalf.

Hopefully they will be able to explain exactly what they need to see, some of which may be acceptable by photo.

Your builder also holds responsibility for the work done and presumably paid for and once it has been established what needs to be done, you could seek recourse through a magistrates course if he isn't prepared to return to rectify any aspects.

Hope you manage to resolve this.

Kind regards
David, LABC

Building Regulations Approval Pending

Submitted 3 years 8 months ago

I am in the process of buying a house that is 13 years old and has been sold once before. My solicitor has now discovered that Building Regulation Approval is Pending and that the current owner took out Indemnity Insurance when they bought the property 10 years ago.
If it is pending does that mean that an application has been made but just never actioned?

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin