What has the X factor got to do with building regulations?

12.12.2017
Blog Post
Letter x - X Factor building regulations

The X factor has become an established part of Saturday night television since starting in 2004. But did you know that the X factor has been in Approved Document A (Structure) since it was first introduced back in 1985?

While a structural engineer can finely tune your design, you can use the really useful table below to help determine minimum pier and return sizes to ensure the stability of masonry without needing the need for structural calculations. 

X Factor diagram - Value of X Factor Approved Document A

In reality the table is a fail-safe that has taken design loads and included a safety factor to ensure it’s stable in all situations.

For example if a roof with a maximum 9m span bears onto the wall and the inner masonry leaf is at least 100mm thick and at least a 7.3N/mm2 compressive strength, then the X factor is 6. If the same structure also had a first floor with a maximum 4.5m span onto it then the X factor would still be 6 or if the span is between 4.5m and 6m then the X factor would be 5 instead.

Once you know the X factor you can then use it in Diagram 14 to work out the masonry sizes:

Diagram 14 - siezes of openings and recesses Approved Document A

Diagram 14 has some simple rules, the main one (1) is that opening sizes are limited to 2L/3, so if the supporting wall is 6m long then the sum of the openings can’t exceed 2x6/3 = 4m.

The width of the piers are then determined using the X factor in relation to adjoining openings and the centreline of the return or buttressing walls.

If we use 6 as the X factor then we can calculate the pier sizes for a 6m long wall.

Diagram 14 - sizes of openings and recesses - version 2

So the openings proposed all work using the formula and X factor with 666mm to spare. Larger openings can still be built but these would need structural design that might include thicker walls or wind posts to maintain stability. Its also worth noting that the return corner pier (note 7) still needs to be at least 665mm wide despite the formula offering 330mm for W4. Remember W4 will be built in the wall buttressing the loaded wall so the 665mm brickwork return provides this stability.

So if you design your building to diagram 14 then it’s three votes from us! 

Further information

View or download Part A and the rest of the Building Regulations Approved Documents:

Technical Guidance section

Comments

Buttressing

Submitted 1 year 6 months ago

I often wonder about this when viewing the various TV shows which show major extensions and removal of internal walls to create large rooms and open plan layouts if they ever consider loss of buttressing?

W4

Submitted 1 year 6 months ago

The example to Note 7 seems to suggest that the pier P5 can be 333mm - but it actually has to be a minimum of 665mm.

If the pier is calculated as W4/X = 665mm - can W4 be as much as 3990mm.

Can we also assume that W4 can be wider with corresponding increase in pier size?

Is W4 limited to 2/3 the length of the wall?

No mention of W4 in the other notes or in relation to W1, W2 or W3 as not exceeding 3m.

Reply

Submitted 1 year 6 months ago

Hello there

Many thanks for pointing this out - you'll see above that we've clarified this with some amended wording.

Julie

W4 again

Submitted 1 year 6 months ago

Julie,

Thanks for reply on the size of the pier.

Any thoughts as to whether W4 can be 6x the pier width?
i.e. a pier width of minimum 665mm would allow W5 to be 3990mm?

A pier width of 890mm would allow W5 to be 5340mm?

Regards,

F

Reply

Submitted 1 year 6 months ago

Hi,

Diagram 14 provides guidance on ensuring the structural stability of the load bearing wall and its buttressing corner piers without the need to seek structural design.

As such you are quite right, the size of P5 (the buttress) would only increase above 665mm if W4 was wider than 3.99m.

However compliance with AD L - Conservation of Fuel & Power is more likely to limit the actual sizes permitted because 'reasonable provision would be to limit windows and doors sizes to 25% of the floor area of the extension'.

David

Webmaster note

Submitted 1 year 6 months ago

All comments posted at an earlier date to this one have been transferred from our old website.

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin