No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

Completion certificate

Submitted 3 years 7 months ago

Hi, so does the LA issue it on the spot or send it to the homeowner or the contractor who done the job

Reply

Submitted 3 years 7 months ago

Hello there

They're usually sent out to the relevant person (usually the homeowner) rather than handed out on the spot.

Kind regards
Julie, LABC

Acceptable standards

Submitted 5 years 7 months ago

All of the previous comments regarding insurance do not address the underlying problem of knowing if the work has been carried out to an acceptable standard. The classic example is removing an internal load bearing wall and not knowing the beam size or what happened with the bearings. Taking into account that, in my experience, both as an ex Local Authority Inspector and as a contractor, 50% of the domestic building workforce have little idea of what constitutes good practice. Without some form of verification it is quite possible that the work is substandard.

Incomplete labc

Submitted 5 years ago

Are builders allowed to complete and make you move into a new build without an labc certificate (but a cover note from labc)if remedial work needs doing externally and cannot be signed off via labc until complete. Could this affect a mortgage or insurance if anything were to happen in the house for eg a wall comes down, or a fire or water damage etc.

Reply to: Incomplete labc

Submitted 5 years ago

Hi there, thanks for your query.

People do move in under these circumstances but it's best to speak to your warranty/insurance provider first. If you have LABC Warranty cover you can contact them on 0800 183 1755. Hope that helps.

Regards,

David, LABC

Building Regs

Submitted 5 years ago

My friend had an extension built 10 years ago which the builder did not have signed off on building regs.
They now face an £80,000 bill to remedy it following thousands already spent on new surveys and land registry. It just doesnt seem right. They cant sell their property as council has lodged it witg their mortgage company. If you can't afford to remedy a mistake a builder made it seems discriminatory by the council as they are forcing a family to lose their home over something that was never their fault because they put their faith in the builder (biggest mistake ever). Anyone else experienced this situation?

(No subject)

Submitted 4 years 11 months ago

We have recently carried out a roof renewal. We need retrospective building regs approval.

loft conversion

Submitted 4 years 11 months ago

previous owners converted loft boarded, velux, radiator and plasterbiard walls. i am selling house but stating it is a loft not a usable room. where do i stand if not stating its a liveable room?? its not no building regs. just a useful storage area accessed by a loft ladder.

Building control certificate issue

Submitted 4 years 11 months ago

I own 9 flats in a building of 47, we have individual flat certificates for all of them with no restrictions on them. However it has just come to light that the communal areas have not had certificate issued. There a five set of stair going to different apartment.
Is this an issue and what is the best thing to do about it

Buying a property that has had work done that wasn't signed off

Submitted 4 years 10 months ago

I have had an offer accepted on a property. However, I have since discovered that in 2014 when the current owner moved in there was a wall removed between the kitchen and lounge without planning consent. There is no lintel there and the estate agent said it doesn't need one as it's a bungalow and not a load bearing wall. I spoke to building control and they said it does need a lintel as storage in the loft can be heavy. The ceiling is bowing and cracking where this wall would have joined the doorway. Bifold doors were installed across the back of the property. The owner thinks there's a steel lintel there but shes not sure and doesn't have paperwork. Planning permission was approved for these but it hasn't been inspected and signed off by building control. None of the work, including the removal of the wall has been signed off by building control. The owner said she didn't get it signed off because she wanted it open plan without a fire door. There is no door between the lounge/kitchen diner and the hallway. Walls were removed here. I asked the estate agent if I could look in the loft but she said she didn't know how to get into it. The loft access is in the hallway near the toilet in the ceiling. There is crooked brickwork seen above some of the windows from the exterior of the property particularly the bathroom and toilet. I asked the owner if the bathroom and toilet windows open and shut properly but she said she has never opened them which is very strange. I have asked about the building company that did the work, but the owner said they have ceased trading and she has no paperwork. The estate agent said she would pay for an indemnity policy but my solicitor said there are so many loopholes that they are not worth the paper they are written on. Also, I will still have the same issues again when I come to sell the property myself.
This all concerns me greatly as I don't want to live in a property that is not deemed safe. I have not paid for a survey as yet, because there are so many obvious issues that need addressing before I am happy to go ahead with the purchase. I also don't want problems with this when I come to sell the property in future myself. I absolutely love the house and have gone to my max price affordable to get it. I really want to live there. I would have thought that any prospective buyer (if it's not me) now or in the future will have the same issues and concerns. Or maybe they would settle for the indemnity insurance and that is what the vendor is hoping for. The estate agent also told me it wasn't a good idea to contact building control as it would now make an insurance policy void. The owner said the place shes buying also has building work that hadn't been signed off so she is getting a structural engineer in to inspect it to make sure it's structurally sound and she is happy for me to get that done for her house but that I will have to pay for this and any subsequent work that needs to be done.
Any suggestions as to how to go ahead with this would be most gratefully received. Thanks 😊

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin