No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

Building regulations approval

Submitted 3 years 4 months ago

If local authority confirm through email that no building reg approval was needed for an outbuilding to the solicitors will that be enough for them to be satisfied also the lender?

Reply

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

Hello there

Hopefully your solicitor and lender will be able to advise.

Many thanks
Julie, LABC

Witton

Submitted 3 years 4 months ago

Trying to buy a house which is just under 10 years old but there isn’t a building control final certificate. Vendor has said they will buy indemnity insurance and we should just proceed but if we want to do work to the house this will surely show up the lack of building control and will this be covered by the indemnity or as it’s c10 years old is the lack of a certificate no longer an issue?

In reply to by Rod (not verified)

Reply

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

Hello there

Thanks for getting in touch.

We recommend investigating the history of the property to try to ascertain the reason for it not receiving a certificate. You should also make enquiries to determine who carried out the building control work on the development and make further enquiries of the building control body responsible.

Kind regards
Julie, LABC

Night Fever

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

Hi, Im buying a 1970s detached house (estate, cul-de-sac). A single storey extension to the rear (kitchen /dining) was supposedly built in 1977. A second floor extension (bedroom) on top of kitchen extension supposedly built in 1987. (walls removed)
All looks good and is still standing after 30-40yrs, but no planning or building approvals have been provided. My solicitor states 'it is not customary to obtain planning documentation for work carried out over 10yrs ago'.
To add, the property has not been registered at Land Registry (one owner since '72 - apparently never registered..), though deeds do exist (and our solicitor has no concern that we can register after purchase)
Read a few QAs from here but still not certain as to whether:
a) I actually still need to possess these permissions/consents; (particularly for selling on in the future)
b) a 'regularisation' application for the 87 extension would be a good idea at least.
Can you advise please so that I can get back to sleeping at night?

How can I get a copy am we are selling the property i need it

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

Hi there I can I get it faster as we are waiting to complete on the paperwork that is required is there any way plz

House conversion 2006, no BCC

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

Our flat is the Ground Floor of an Edwardian terrace, converted in 2006 by the previous owner. My wife and I bought the Ground Floor, and another chap purchased the First Floor Flat (with 2nd Storey). The property is a Shared Freehold. The guy upstairs sold his property in 2015, and a new couple moved in.

It's not been the easiest of relationships with the new owners upstairs, due to a couple of breaches of the Lease (Which we've only just discovered recently) and an appalling, selfish attitude. However, they are now (thankfully) in the process of selling their flat. Unfortunately, it has now come up through their selling process that neither of our flats have a Building Control Certificate. Apparently, a contravention was logged back in 2010, but neither my wife or I, or the previous upstairs owner have any awareness of this. It only appears to have come up now as they are preparing to sell - although, as I see it, how have there been three sales since 2006, and this has never been questioned by any solicitor? Or even mortgage lender?

Is this something that immediately affects us as the owners of the Ground Floor Flat? Or is it something that only immediately concerns the owners of the First Floor Flat as they are in the process of selling and the buyer has requested it? Can ours be assessed at a later date, if required, rather than at the whim of our upstairs neighbours?

As far as I can ascertain, prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases.

My wife and I haven't changed anything since we moved in in 2006, other than an electrical and plumbing check performed at the time. We do have current plans to refurbish the whole flat, within the bounds of building regulations and control, but it won't be until after the whole Covid crisis has dissipated - and even then, we have no plans to sell, happy as we are in our abode.

I've been informed that a Building Inspector is coming tomorrow morning, and it's making me feel quite pressured that this may be an unexpected and costly matter. If anybody has some reassuring words, I'd be grateful.

Rretrospective certificaiton before another change

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

We added patio doors late in the planning for an extension but now find this was not updated on the architect's drawings submitted successfully for building regs approval. We've discovered this while planning a further update to replace the doors with wider bifolds. So the patio doors will be removed and building regs approval sought for the new work. How will lack of the original approval affect the new application?

Getting completion certificate recognised by local authority.

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

Hi Julie, thanks for the articles and your replies to comments. Really interesting and informative!

We have a completion certificate for work done 20 odd years ago. We are the second owners so did not have the work done ourselves but we requested the completion certificate from local building control and have email evidence from them that the certificate was supplied by them and the work was "signed off and above board".

However when the local search is requested by the solicitors and run by the local authority (council) the work comes back as completed but not signed off. Is there any way to get the council to update this and have them recognise officially that the work was done in accordance with the building regs of the time?

Thanks again

Does an indemnity cover all risks associated with a lack of BRA

Submitted 3 years 3 months ago

Hi,

We are very close to exchange on a property, which had a significant 2 storey extension done 13 years ago. Whilst Planning permission was granted, there is no BRA and Completion certificate. The vendor solicitors are insisting that with the provision of the indemnity, there are no risks as the construction is over 10 years old. I am concerned about:
1.> Whilst market conditions may vary, what sort of discounts get applied to (e.g 1%-5%) if the property is about a $1million?
2.> Would the indemnity be void if I have to approach the council for any future works requiring council authorisation?
3.> Whilst the build quality looks fine, would a clean structural survey not identifying any defects, protect me further from any future enforcements?
4.> Is it reasonable to ask the vendor to cover the cost of an additional structural survey and any remedial works required (provided they are not significant)?

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin