No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

Building Regs Pickle

Submitted 3 years 1 month ago

10+ years ago we brought a house that needed some work done. We're now in the process of selling this house, but enquiries have uncovered some shortfalls in our LA Building Regs compliance. For example our builder submitted an application to remove internal walls, make adjustments to a lean to roof, remove chimney breasts and remove a load baring wall. The intention was to install steel across the load baring wall, then use a brick built lean to beyond the rear load baring wall (but still part of the existing house footprint) to install bifold doors, opening up the kitchen. The design also included turning an old outside WC, in part of that lean to and creating a downstairs WC/shower room. However when the building surveyor attended to inspect works, he would not sign off the steel as he said the WC in the lean to had been brought into the house and regulations required a lobby between the WC and the kitchen. By this time, I'd brought a new WC suite and shower that had been installed, so against my wife's better judgement I decided to press on with the original design. I also brought the bifold doors from a retailer and my builder installed them. The enquiries are also asking if we have building regs for the bifolds, which I don't.... I don't think they were even part of the original application. So currently I have no building regs for the steel, the WC/Shower or the bifold. My solicitor has said that an indemnity will cover these elements, but my buyer is an investor who plans to let the property and is being cautious - he's instructed a home buyers report to assure (his lender was satisfied with the lenders survey). I'm just wondering if anyone has experience of a case like this and what they did to resolve? I could remove the downstairs WC, expose the steel and make a new LA application, which i'm thinking may be the only way I can assure the risks, as i'm sure these issues will arise again if I lose this buyer..... thoughts ?

Work already completed

Submitted 3 years 1 month ago

Hi, I had work completed by a structural engineer (he dug one hole and filled with concrete) under a 2m wall to satisfy the structural issue there. He signed if off did drawings etc...but did not get building regs to check it out whilst work was being done.
Any advice would be great as I am the buyer of this property and we're now near completion date.

Reply

Submitted 3 years ago

Hello there - thanks for leaving your comment.

We would advise you to get in touch with your local authority building control team - they'll be able to advise.

Kind regards
Julie, LABC

Building regs

Submitted 3 years ago

Buying a house which had permission in 2005 to have two storey extension. Have found the plans and given permission on line but the seller and the seller before them only had a indemnity certificate. What are the pitfalls of buying this house and also resale in the future.

(No subject)

Submitted 3 years ago

Hello there

We can't comment on individual cases so you're best speaking to your local authority building control team about this matter. As we've mentioned previously in the comments and above the purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Kind regards
Julie, LABC

Regularisation

Submitted 3 years ago

While I understand the logic in over charging as a deterrent 99% of people who end up in the unfortunate situation of going through regularisation have normally inherited this problem via property purchase so in essence the wrong person is being punished surely common sense should prevail in all cases and either the previous owner be prosecuted or if the work has been there for more than 10 years and looks in perfectly good shape a more gentle inspection should be carried out and the work certified.
Also if builders were regulated in the same way as plumbers for gas and electricians are both constantly having their knowledge tested and signed off this would flush our all the cowboys.

Regularisation certificate for loft conversion and rear extensio

Submitted 3 years ago

Hi there
I am in the process of buying a house with double dormer loft conversion and single storey extension done back in 2006.

No original building control certificate was obtained but the vendor has recently (Feb 2021) obtained a regularisation certificate from the local council for "Loft conversion & rear and side kitchen extension. New cloakroom"

There is a footnote in the certificate stating "LIMITATION OF CERTIFICATE - This certificate relates only to the work described above"

Would this regularisation certificate be equivalent to a building control sign off for the following aspects, as all the works were carried out when the conversion/extension work was done
1) foundation that had been underpinned as part of the loft conversion;
2) new drainage system;
3) double glazing windows, velux window and roof-light
4) structural removal of the outrigger chimney breast and stack on the roof level
5) new electrical and gas installation;
6) insulation between cavity wall;
7) staircase installation to the loft

It is rather confusing what does this regularisation certificate actually cover.

Roof replacement - slate to tile

Submitted 2 years 7 months ago

My partner and I have recently bought a property. In the course of the purchase, we learned that in 2015 the original slate roof tiles were replaced with tiles. No approval of the work was sought from the local authority and an indemnity policy was issued in respect of the work. However, and conscious that I risk invalidating the indemnity policy, I'd like to look into having a regularisation certificate issued. What do I need to do? Many thanks.

(No subject)

Submitted 2 years 6 months ago

Hi,

We are unable to comment on the legal status of the indemnity you have or its validity, you may wish to take legal advice on this matter. If you would like to apply for a Regularisation Certificate, please contact the Building Control team at your Local Authority to discuss. You can find the contact details of the relevant Building Control team by entering your postcode in the search box at the top right-hand side of our website.

Best,
LABC team

Approval for already fitted log buner

Submitted 2 years 6 months ago

We have a log burning stove which a Hetas engineer will not sign off, not becuse it is non complaint but becuse he didint fit it , Can we apply for building regs instesd

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin