No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

LABC response

Submitted 2 years 4 months ago

In broad terms, Building Regulations consider the relevant technical building standards for any controlled building work to a property. Planning permission is also provided by the Local Authority and in broad terms considers the visual impact of the extensions. The completion certificate for Building Regulations has no relevance to Planning Permission and visa versa.

I cannot comment on the indemnity question and would advise you to contact your Local Planning team for advice.

Best,
LABC team

Majority of house without regs consent

Submitted 2 years 3 months ago

Hello,
We are in the process of purchasing a house that was built as a two bed in the 1600s, extended a little in the 1980s, and then extended again several times between 1995 and 2010. It is now a large, rambling five bed. The survey shows no significant issues but notes seven internal walls removed (apparently opening up as the building was extended). The planning applications process was followed but no building regs consents exist for any part. The owner has applied for retrospective consent, but I suspect there is little chance of approval without very invasive examination and some (possibly much) remedial work. Is the LABC the only body the owner can work through, or can an approved contractor of some kind provide a solution that would assure my prospective mortgage lender and home insurer (and me!)?
Many thanks.

LABC response

Submitted 2 years 3 months ago

Hi,

In terms of your question, the owner should arrange for the LABC team to consider the work that was carried out after November 1985 (this is the date that applies for retrospective Building Regulation applications-known as Regularisation applications) It is only your LA who have the powers in the legislation to check any illegal building work. You may of course use a bona fide contractor, but any such work should be checked by your LABC team

Best,
LABC team

Regulisation

Submitted 2 years 3 months ago

We have a 3 year old extension to a house recently purchased that didn't get original building regulations but last year got building regulisation after LA inspection. Do building insurance firms generally still accept this or could there be issues if I ever went to claim?

LABC response

Submitted 2 years 3 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your enquiry. A regularisation certificate gives evidence (but not conclusive evidence) that the relevant requirements specified in the certificate have been complied with and would be issued where the local authority has been able to satisfy themselves that this is the case.

We are unable to comment on whether a regularisation or completion certificate would be accepted by any external body (including insurers). Please contact your insurer to discuss and clarify any particular requirements for the agreement you may have with them.

Best,
LABC team

Cesspit

Submitted 2 years 3 months ago

I'm in the process of purchasing a property that uses a joint Cesspit with its neighbours. The house was constructed 72 years ago in the 50s and no properties on the road have been sold since.

I wanted to check do building regulations cover cesspits too, the issue we have is that it is near a water course, the pit doesn't leak but it too close under current guidance. Someone mentioned to me about a 1985 Environmental Certificate on builds and within this, as the property was build before this there should be no issue. Any advice is welcome

In reply to by P Brown (not verified)

LABC response

Submitted 2 years 2 months ago

Hi,
The provision of cess pits as a form of foul water disposal is provided for in the Building Regulations. The guidance in approved document H refers to cesspools in section H2. If there is no alteration and the existing cesspit is in good condition, then there is no requirement to update or improve it.
If you are thinking of relocating or adding to the existing system, then you should contact your LABC team and Environment agency.

Best,
LABC team

Complaint re un-authoriseed building work

Submitted 2 years 2 months ago

I have noticed un-authorised building work.
The property owner is developing on the land which is not part of his planning permission and has not consulted with the neighbours or the council.

Can this be looked into, as its causing an eye sore and dirt and dust to the neighbouring allotments and gardens where many animal are kept.

LABC response

Submitted 2 years 2 months ago

Hi,

LABC is a membership organisation, providing advice and support to its member local authorities around England and Wales. As a result, LABC cannot comment on Planning or the application and enforcement of Building Regulations to a particular situation as this is a matter for the local council and ultimately the courts.

Please contact your Local Authority to discuss or report issues related to planning and building regulations. You can find the contact details of the relevant local authority by entering your postcode on the government website at: https://www.gov.uk/find-local-council. In this instance, we have made the relevant authority aware of the report.

Best,
LABC team

No Building Regulation For extended kitchen but having Indemnity

Submitted 2 years 2 months ago

Hi,
I am planning to buy a property which is built in 1930's. The seller has an extended kitchen but doesn't have a building regulation/control certificate. This extension had been done before they purchased the property (before 2016) and can be seen in planning permission for other parts of the property (i.e. Out Building as a Hobby room which has been approved approx 15 years back in 2003).

The seller also has Hobby room (Outbuilding) planning permission but doesn't have building control for this. We thought we can manage this as it is a separate part and not included in the main building.

As our surveyor and solicitor noted - we definitely needed a building control or equivalent regulation certificate by the local authority or approved private inspector to avoid risk to 1) get building control for further extensions and 2) selling the property in the future.

Please suggest. Many Thanks

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin