No building regulations approval? What's the solution?

Blog Post
No building regulations approval - picture of dog

When a property is up for sale and building work has been carried out on it, the seller will need a form of certification to say that the works have been inspected and that they comply with the building regulations.

At least, that seems to be the current view of many engaged in the conveyancing of properties.

Is building regulations approval really needed?

There are a number of snags with this:

  • Some works don’t need building regulations approval
  • Some could have been done before the regulations changed to include them
  • Others may have been carried out prior to the early 90s, before Certificates of Completion were introduced

Therefore, some works might not have needed approval, some did need approval but have no certificate and, in the worst case, they did need approval but no-one has applied for it!

In all these cases, there will be no documentation to show that the project is compliant with the building regulations.

Routes to building regulations approval

From the 11th November 1985 onwards, there have been two routes to gaining building regulations approval for building work. 

1. Through the local authority.

2. Through a private company, approved by the Secretary of State to carry out such work and issue approvals. Such companies are known as “Approved Inspectors”.

There are differences in the documentation issued, dependent on which route you take.

The key documents are those that are issued to state that the building works have been approved, inspected and passed. Where the work has been undertaken with the council's approval, the document is a “Building Regulations Certificate of Completion” and if an Approved Inspector is used, the document is a “Building Regulations Final Certificate”.

What happens if there is no approval, when there should be?

If building regulations approval and certification should have been obtained for building works and no such approval exists, there are potential consequences. Under the provisions of Section 36(6), Building Act 1984, the council can seek a High Court injunction to require the alteration or removal of work that doesn't comply.

Such an action can be expensive for a buyer. To add to the expense, the costs of either remedying the building or removing the offending work can be high.

Therefore, some have considered it wise to purchase indemnity insurance to cover such costs, should they arise.

The purchase of an insurance indemnity policy may cover the issue for one sale, but it doesn't remove the problem with the property.

What about the next time the property is sold?

The same situation exists, the same delays may occur, the same threat of action by the local authority remains, no progress has been made, the vicious circle continues.

Is this in the best interests of the home owner?

The way forward? Regularisation.

The clear way to break the vicious circle is to obtain regularisation certificate - this is the process by which a retrospective building regulations application can be made.

There are, however, some drawbacks with this:

1. The regularisation process cannot be used for work that was carried out prior to the 11th November 1985.

2. The process is a double-edged sword as what might have been thought to have been a simple lack of paperwork may turn out to be much more complex and expensive to rectify. When the remedial work is not undertaken, a Certificate of Regularisation will not be issued.

Some other issues to take into consideration are that building regulations regularisation can only be obtained from the relevant local authority as private sector Approved Inspectors aren't authorised to undertake this work. Further, the council will charge for the service they provide, and the charge will be higher than the one they would have raised at the time the application should have been made. (This is done deliberately as an incentive to applicants to make submissions in a timely manner.)

Nevertheless, only by making a regularisation application can the applicant find out definitively what is non-compliant with their building works.

How does this affect the sale of your property?

Knowing that approval can be given retrospectively might be enough for a buyer to take on the property. Then again it might not.

Whichever, it will be the owner’s responsibility to undertake the works to achieve building regulations compliance and it's important to know that this can be made a requirement before your sale can go through.

Completion certificates for work done before 2013

Update 20 November 2020. We've had many queries on work done years previously as you can see from the comments below. Here's some further information for those in that position:

Prior to 2013 there was no requirement for local authorities to issue completion certificates in all cases. Some authorities adopted a procedure to issue completions before this date, but not all, and the earlier the date the less likely it is that completion certificates would be available.  Consequently it may not be possible to provide a completion certificate for work carried out  before 2013.  Although there are provisions within the regulations for a local authority to accept applications to regularise work carried out without approval, there is no obligation on a local authority to accept such application. Also  the greater the length of time since work was completed, the less likely this would provide a satisfactory solution.

Conveyancing solicitors have increasingly demanded completion certificates, which was part of the reason for their introduction into regulation in 2013, unfortunately their demands do not take account when building work was completed. Provision of some form of indemnity policy is often promoted as an alternative, however this is usually only to cover legal action by the local authority for contravention of building regulations. A surveyors report indicating the current status of the property in relation to building regulations applicable at the time the work was carried out may be more beneficial to future occupiers.

Homeowner?

Read more on Front Door

 

More on this topic

Further information on home improvements can be found on LABC's Front Door website.

Every care was taken to ensure the information was correct at the time of publication. Any written guidance provided does not replace the user’s professional judgement. It is the responsibility of the dutyholder or person carrying out the work to ensure compliance with relevant building regulations or applicable technical standards.


This article was updated on 21 March 2022

Comments

LABC response

Submitted 2 years 2 months ago

Hi,

Thank you for your recent web form question. LABC recommends that you discuss the matter with your property professionals and the local authority building control service at your local council, who are the enforcing authority for building regulations.

However, outbuildings that satisfy the construction and dimensional characteristics for building regulation 9 (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/2214/regulation/9) and class 6(1) of Schedule 2 (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/2214/schedule/2/part/6) are exempt from all building regulations and the council will not be able to enforce the building regulations, including giving any form of retrospective approval or certificate.

On the matter of the possible unauthorised extension, we strongly recommend that contact be made with your local authority building control service, if this has not been done already, to check if there has ever been a historic application made for the extension. If not, a regularisation certificate can be applied for, if it can be shown that the work was carried out after 11 November 1985 – which is the cut-off date for historic building work. If the extension was built after 11 November 1985, then the council needs to advise you as to what they will expect to be provided with in terms of detailed plans and specifications and possibly exposing/uncovering parts of the extension for inspection, to prove the work complied with the regulations that were in force at the time the extension was built.

As you may appreciate trying to show which regulations/standards are applied may prove difficult if it cannot be determined when the work was actually carried out. As such the advice of the council building control service will be essential.

Best,
LABC team

Building Regulation Approval

Submitted 2 years 2 months ago

I am in process of buying a house near Ruislip. Unfortunately we found that they carried out the work in 2000 , they have planning permission but building approval certificate was not taken after the work is completed.
1. Can council still fine
2. How safe is to buy this house with indemnity insurance
3. What is the way out to get building approval certification
3. How costly can this be.

LABC response

Submitted 2 years 1 month ago

Hi,

Thank you for your recent enquiry. LABC are a member organisation and therefore you should contact the LA where you live as they can provide project specific advice. I can however provide general advice in response to your questions as follows.

1. Can council still fine? It is unlikely that the Council can take any formal action after this period, albeit you should check with your local council.
2. How safe is it to buy this house with indemnity insurance? I have no information to be able to reply, again you should check with your LA.
3. What is the way out to get building approval certification? You can make a regularisation application to your LA in this case.
4.. How costly can this be? The LA will advise of the relevant fees to inspect and accept an application for Building Regulations.

Best,
LABC team

extension 10 years

Submitted 2 years 1 month ago

i built a single story extension to kitchen with building regs but never got final certificate what are my options if i want to sell

LABC response

Submitted 2 years 1 month ago

Hi,

Thank you for your enquiry. It is best to discuss this with the Building Control team at your Local Authority. You can find the contact details of the relevant Building Control team by entering your postcode in the search box at the top right-hand side of our website.

We recommend that a completion inspection is requested as soon as works are completed, with any works needed are undertaken to obtain the certificate. This could help to avoid any delays when you are looking to sell your property.

Best,
LABC team

Loft conversion 40+ years ago

Submitted 1 year 10 months ago

Hi we are in the process of purchasing a house that had a loft conversion done before the current owners bought the property. This was over 40+ years ago. Can this room be classed as a bedroom (estate agents say it can)? There is no evidence of planning permission due to the age of it. The loft conversion looks like it has been done to a good standard. We are just worried that the mortgage company will not like this.

Kind regards
Claire

LABC response

Submitted 1 year 10 months ago

Hi,

Thanks for your enquiry, I would advise that your best course of action is to contact the LABC team where you are based in terms of Building Regulations. You would then try to clarify when the work was done, and you can then decide on the best way forward in terms of the use of the loft conversion. Panning permission (in broad terms the visual impact) is a separate aspect to Building Regulations ( the technical construction standards to ensure it is built to an appropriate and safe standard)

Best,
LABC team

1980’s loft conversion

Submitted 1 year 10 months ago

Hi,
I bought my dormer bungalow in 2009. The council couldn’t provide building regulations approval but I do have a copy of the approved loft conversion plan dated 23.07.1981. I purchased an indemnity policy as suggested by my solicitor.
Prior to purchasing I had planned to redo the loft conversion to reconfigure the layout (and obtain a building regulations approval) but I am going to modernise the house and would like all the required paperwork in place for when I sell it in 2-3 years.
I made enquiries at the local council, they mentioned a regularisation certificate and directed me to the building surveying Dept. But I read on your website that a regularisation certificate is not applicable on works carried out before 11 November 1985.
A builder identified a joist needs raising so a surveyors report seems to be a must.
1) Should it be a Structural Survey Inspection?
2) How much should I budget for the survey?
3) Will the report make it easier for me to sell the house or is redoing the loft conversion my best option?
Kind regards
Michele

LABC response

Submitted 1 year 10 months ago

Hi Michele,

Thank you for your enquiry. If the work was carried out prior to the 11th of November 1985 then, as you have outlined , the LA have no ability to become involved in terms of Building Regulations. However, you would need to decide on what you would like to do with what appears to be unauthorised work. You could get a full structural survey and then decide what to do following that survey. It would be impossible to confirm, by e-mail, the impact of this on selling the property at a later date. We would also not be able to advise on the cost of this.

If you were to re do the loft, then you would need to make an application for Building Regulations to your LA. The structural survey may not cover other important aspects for your loft conversion such as fire safety, weather protection, ventilation, drainage, staircases, heating, thermal efficiency, or electrical work for example as these are also important considerations where such work is carried out.

Best,
LABC team

Regularisation certificate process for loft conversion

Submitted 1 year 9 months ago

Hi,

We converted our loft to a bedroom with planning approval in 2006. We applied for Building Control approval on completion, which was denied. The main issue was insufficient height at the stairs entering the loft room (new staircase, dormer construction). If this was the only issue, we would have remedied that by possibly adding a velux window to gain extra 10cm head clearance.

However, the Building Control feedback mentioned a number of other issues, not connected to the loft project at all - such as fire doors downstairs, hardboard under carpets on first floor required.

We did not engage a builder to remedy any of this at the time (mainly because we did not understand the relevance of the non-loft related changes they demanded).

We now wish to get a completion certificate, which will presumably require us to fix the headroom issue - but is it likely that we will really need to replace doors, windows etc elsewhere in the house as well? I assume the LA Building Control team will advise us via a conversation, without cost and before engaging the Regularistion process and paying those fees? Please advise, thank you..

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sign up to the building bulletin newsletter

Over 48,000 construction professionals have already signed up for the LABC Building Bulletin.

Join them and receive useful tips, practical technical information and industry news by email once every 6 weeks.

Subscribe to the Building Bulletin